PM&R Meeting Abstracts

Official abstracts site for the AAPM&R Annual Assembly and the PM&R Journal.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2022
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2021
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2020
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2019
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (Compression vs Distraction ): A Case Study

GIUSEPPE PAESE, DO (Florida Spine & Sports Specialists, Fort Lauderdale, Florida); Kerstin Yu; Christopher Johnson, MMS

Meeting: AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2021

Categories: Pain and Spine Medicine (2021)

Session Information

Session Title: AA 2021 Virtual Posters - Pain and Spine Medicine

Session Time: None. Available on demand.

Disclosures: GIUSEPPE PAESE, DO: No financial relationships or conflicts of interest

Case Diagnosis: Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Joint Instability

Case Description: This case report demonstrates the efficacy of a new SI joint fusion technique which achieves fusion by distraction of the joint rather than compressing it. We were able to compare the results of both procedures which were performed sequentially on contralateral SI joints of the patient in question. SI joint dysfunction is a commonly overlooked diagnosis in patients presenting with chronic low back pain. This condition is often unresponsive to injections and rhizotomies in the long term, leaving joint fusion as the standard definitive solution for pain relief. The traditional method for SI joint fusion is an invasive surgery performed by orthopedic surgeons, utilizing hardware to compress and immobilize the joint. This new method involves distraction of the joint and implantation of bone allograft for fusion. It is a minimally invasive procedure which can be performed by pain medicine specialists at an outpatient surgery center. The parameters used to compare the two methods are pain reduction on a scale from 0 to 10, functionality, opioid usage and recovery time at specific intervals after the two procedures. Data was gathered through patient interviews and past medical records.

Setting: Outpatient Clinic; Ft. Lauderdale, FLAssessment/

Results: Following the later fusion, the patient demonstrated a marked decrease in pain, decreased opioid usage and improved functionality at all intervals with a shorter recovery period compared to her prior fusion.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of a patient having bilateral SI joint fusions with both methods.

Conclusion: It is our opinion that fusing the SI joint by means of insertion of bone allograft into a wide graft window following joint distraction will yield better outcomes when compared to more traditional techniques which compress the joint via hardware placement.

Level of Evidence: Level V

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

PAESE G, Yu K, Johnson C. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (Compression vs Distraction ): A Case Study [abstract]. PM R. 2021; 13(S1)(suppl 1). https://pmrjabstracts.org/abstract/sacroiliac-joint-fusion-compression-vs-distraction-a-case-study/. Accessed May 11, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2021

PM&R Meeting Abstracts - https://pmrjabstracts.org/abstract/sacroiliac-joint-fusion-compression-vs-distraction-a-case-study/

Leading the Way. Baltimore, MD & Virtual. October 20-23, 2022. #aapmr22

PM&R Journal

View issues of PM&R on the Wiley Online Library »

American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Visit the official site for the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation »

AAPM&R Annual Assembly

Visit the official site for the AAPM&R Annual Assembly »

  • Help & Support
  • About Us
  • Cookies & Privacy
  • Wiley Job Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertisers & Agents
Copyright © 2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Wiley