PM&R Meeting Abstracts

Official abstracts site for the AAPM&R Annual Assembly and the PM&R Journal.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2022
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2021
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2020
    • AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2019
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Prospective Study Comparing Physical Exam Maneuvers to Intra-articular Anesthetic Injection in the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology

Reza Ehsanian, MD, PhD (University of New Mexico, San Jose, CA, United States); Byron Schneider, MD; Renee Rosati, DO; Lisa Huynh; Joshua Levin, MD; David J. Kennedy, MD

Meeting: AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2019

Session Information

Date: Thursday, November 14, 2019

Session Title: Research Spotlight: Spine and Pain Medicine

Session Time: 2:30pm-3:15pm

Location: Research Hub - Live Theater

Disclosures: Reza Ehsanian, MD, PhD: Nothing to disclose

Objective: Determine the diagnostic validity of sacroiliac joint physical exam maneuvers using anesthetic intra-articular injection as a reference standard.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic outpatient surgical center.

Participants: Thirty-five participants referred for sacroiliac joint injection.

Interventions: Fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injection of 1cc of 2% lidocaine and 1cc of triamcinolone 40mg.

Main Outcome Measures: Pain was assessed via a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale in response to six physical exam maneuvers (Thigh thrust, Gaenslen’s, FABER, Distraction, Compression, and Sacral Thrust) performed pre-injection and post-injection. The results of these were evaluated singly and in combinations for diagnostic power in relation to a positive anesthetic response (> 80% relief) to the injection.

Results: There was no statistically or clinically significant association of a single or combination of physical exam maneuvers (PEMs) to positive anesthetic response. No single PEM had a positive likelihood ratio of greater than 1.58. Distraction test had the highest likelihood ratio of 1.58 for any single PEM, and was also the most sensitive (0.67; 95% CI 0.35-0.88) and specific (0.58; 95% CI 0.39-0.75) single PEM. Increasing the number of positive PEMs did not improve the diagnostic power. The highest likelihood ratio of PEMs in combination was only 1.2, which was for > 2 PEMs. There was a corresponding negative predictive value 0 (95% CI 0-0.18) when all PEMs were negative.

Conclusions: In this patient cohort, PEMs to identify intra-articular SIJ pain did not demonstrate diagnostic value when compared to the reference standard of an intra-articular injection with anesthetic.

Level of Evidence: Level II

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ehsanian R, Schneider B, Rosati R, Huynh L, Levin J, Kennedy DJ. Prospective Study Comparing Physical Exam Maneuvers to Intra-articular Anesthetic Injection in the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology [abstract]. PM R. 2019; 11(S2)(suppl 2). https://pmrjabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-study-comparing-physical-exam-maneuvers-to-intra-articular-anesthetic-injection-in-the-diagnosis-of-sacroiliac-joint-pathology/. Accessed May 12, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to AAPM&R Annual Assembly 2019

PM&R Meeting Abstracts - https://pmrjabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-study-comparing-physical-exam-maneuvers-to-intra-articular-anesthetic-injection-in-the-diagnosis-of-sacroiliac-joint-pathology/

Leading the Way. Baltimore, MD & Virtual. October 20-23, 2022. #aapmr22

PM&R Journal

View issues of PM&R on the Wiley Online Library »

American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Visit the official site for the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation »

AAPM&R Annual Assembly

Visit the official site for the AAPM&R Annual Assembly »

  • Help & Support
  • About Us
  • Cookies & Privacy
  • Wiley Job Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertisers & Agents
Copyright © 2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Wiley